Investor's wiki
en English
Navigation
Home Glossary
InvestingStocksBondsCryptoPersonal FinanceFundamental AnalysisTechnical AnalysisTradingBankingTaxes
Disclaimer Terms of Use Privacy Policy Cookie Policy
Navigation
Home Glossary
InvestingStocksBondsCryptoPersonal FinanceFundamental AnalysisTechnical AnalysisTradingBankingTaxes
Disclaimer Terms of Use Privacy Policy Cookie Policy

Poison Pill

Poison Pill
BusinessCorporate Finance and AccountingMergers and AcquisitionsM&A

What Is a Poison Pill?

The term poison pill alludes to a defense strategy utilized by a target firm to prevent or deter a potential hostile takeover by an acquiring company. Potential targets utilize this strategy in order to make them look less appealing to the expected acquirer.

In spite of the fact that they're not generally the first — and best — method for defending a company, poison pills are generally exceptionally effective.

Understanding Poison Pills

Takeovers are genuinely common in the business world, where one company makes an offer to take command over another. Bigger companies will more often than not take over more modest ones to get into another market, when there are operational benefits by combining the two elements, or when the acquirer needs to eliminate the competition. Takeovers, however, aren't generally amicable and become hostile when the target would entertain or not like to be dominated.

The poison pill strategy has been around since the 1980s and was contrived by New York-based legal firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen, and Katz. The name comes from the poison pill spies carried in the past to try not to be questioned by their foes in the event they were caught. It was planned as a method for preventing an acquiring company from buying a majority share in the possible target or from negotiating with shareholders straightforwardly when takeovers were becoming exceptionally regular and common.

At the point when a company turns into the target of a hostile takeover, it might utilize the poison pill strategy to make itself less alluring to the potential acquirer. As the name indicates, a poison pill is comparable to something that is hard to swallow or acknowledge. A company targeted for an undesirable takeover might utilize a poison pill to make its shares unfavorable to the acquiring firm or individual. Poison pills additionally altogether raise the cost of acquisitions and make big disincentives to totally dissuade such endeavors.

The mechanism safeguards minority shareholders and maintains a strategic distance from the change of control of company management. Implementing a poison pill may not necessarily indicate that the company isn't willing to be acquired. On occasion, it very well might be sanctioned to get a higher valuation or better terms for the acquisition.

Special Considerations

Since shareholders — who are the real owners of a company — can vote by majority to lean toward the acquisition, the target company management sends a poison pill, which is normally a specially planned shareholder rights plan with certain conditions drafted explicitly to defeat endeavored takeovers.

There are three major likely disservices to poison pills:

  1. Stock values become diluted, so shareholders frequently need to purchase new shares just to keep even.
  2. Institutional investors are discouraged from buying into corporations that have aggressive defenses.
  3. Ineffective managers can remain in place through poison pills. On the off chance that that weren't the case, outside venture entrepreneurs could possibly buy the firm and work on its value with better managing staff.

Poison pills are officially known as shareholder rights plans.

Types of Poison Pills

There are two types of poison pill strategies — the flip-in and flip-over. Of the two types, the flip-in assortment is all the more commonly followed.

Flip-in Poison Pill

A flip-in poison pill strategy involves allowing the shareholders, with the exception of the acquirer, to purchase extra shares at a discount. However purchasing extra shares furnishes shareholders with instantaneous profits, the practice weakens the value of the limited number of shares previously purchased by the acquiring company. This right to purchase is given to the shareholders before the takeover is finalized and is much of the time set off when the acquirer hoards a certain threshold percentage of shares of the target company.

Here is a model. Suppose a flip-in poison pill plan is set off when the acquirer purchases 30% of the target company's shares. When set off, each shareholder — excluding the acquirer — is qualified for buy new shares at a discounted rate. The greater the number of shareholders who buy extra shares, the more diluted the acquiring company's interest becomes. This makes the cost of the bid a lot higher.

As new shares clear a path to the market, the value of shares held by the acquirer diminishes, in this way making the takeover endeavor more costly and more troublesome. On the off chance that a bidder knows that such a plan could be initiated, they might be inclined not to seek after a takeover. Such provisions of a flip-in are many times publicly available in a company's local laws, or charter, and indicate their possible use as a takeover defense.

Flip-Over Poison Pill

A flip-over poison pill strategy permits stockholders of the target company to purchase the shares of the acquiring company at a profoundly discounted price on the off chance that the hostile takeover endeavor is fruitful. For instance, a target company shareholder might gain the right to buy the stock of its acquirer at a two-for-one rate, consequently diluting the equity in the acquiring company. The acquirer might try not to proceed such acquisitions on the off chance that it sees a dilution of value post-acquisition.

Poison Pill Examples

Daddy John's

In July 2018, the board of restaurant chain Papa John's (PZZA) voted to take on the poison pill to prevent removed pioneer John Schnatter from gaining control of the company. Schnatter, who possessed 30% of the company's stock, was the biggest shareholder of the company.

To cancel any conceivable takeover endeavors by Schnatter, the company's board of directors adopted a Limited Duration Stockholders Rights plan — a poison pill provision. Named the wolf-pack provision, It basically multiplied the share price for any individual who endeavored to store up in excess of a certain percentage of the company's shares without board endorsement.

The New York Times reported that the plan would produce results assuming Schnatter and his members brought their combined stake up in the company to 31%, or on the other hand assuming that anybody purchased 15% of the common stock without the board's endorsement.

Since Schnatter was excluded from the dividend distribution, the strategy effectively made a hostile takeover of the company ugly: the potential acquirer would need to pay two times the value per share of the company's common stock. It prevented him from trying to assume control over the company he established by buying its shares at market price.

Netflix

In 2012, Netflix (NFLX) announced that a shareholder rights plan was adopted by its board just days after investor Carl Icahn acquired a 10% stake. The new plan stipulated that with any new acquisition of 10% or more, any Netflix merger, sales, or transfer of over half of assets, takes into consideration existing shareholders to purchase two shares at the cost of one.

Features

  • Poison pills permit existing shareholders the right to purchase extra shares at a discount, effectively diluting the ownership interest of a new, hostile party.
  • Poison pills frequently come in two structures — the flip-in and flip-over strategies.
  • A poison pill is a defense strategy used by a target company to prevent or deter hostile takeover endeavors.

FAQ

What's a Flip-Over Poison Pill?

A flip-over poison pill strategy permits stockholders of the target company to purchase the shares of the acquiring company at a profoundly discounted price in the event that the hostile takeover endeavor is fruitful. For instance, a target company shareholder might gain the right to buy the stock of its acquirer at a two-for-one rate, subsequently diluting the equity in the acquiring company. The acquirer might try not to proceed such acquisitions on the off chance that it sees a dilution of value post-acquisition.

Why Are Poison Pills Used?

At the point when a company turns into the target of a hostile takeover, it might utilize the poison pill strategy to make itself less alluring to the expected acquirer. This strategy makes its shares unfavorable, or challenging to acknowledge, to the acquiring firm or individual. Poison pills additionally altogether raise the cost of acquisitions and make big disincentives to totally prevent such endeavors. The mechanism safeguards minority shareholders and keeps away from the change of control of company management.

What Are the Disadvantages of Poison Pills?

There are three major likely hindrances to poison pills. Stock values become diluted, so shareholders frequently need to purchase new shares just to keep even. Institutional investors are discouraged from buying into corporations that have aggressive defenses. Ineffective managers can remain in place through poison pills. On the off chance that that weren't the case, outside venture business people could possibly buy the firm and work on its value with better managing staff.

What's a Flip-in Poison Pill?

A flip-in poison pill strategy involves allowing the shareholders, with the exception of the acquirer, to purchase extra shares at a discount. However purchasing extra shares gives shareholders instantaneous profits, the practice weakens the value of the limited number of shares previously purchased by the acquiring company. This right to purchase is given to the shareholders before the takeover is finalized and is many times set off when the acquirer hoards a certain threshold percentage of shares of the target company.